New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani Says City Lacks Authority to Arrest Benjamin Netanyahu

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has acknowledged that the city does not have the independent legal authority to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu under the International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant, reversing earlier suggestions that his administration was exploring legal options. In a video statement released by his office, Mamdani said his administration had reviewed every available legal avenue to determine whether New York City could execute the ICC warrant if Netanyahu visited the city. Following that review, he concluded that municipal authorities lack the jurisdiction to enforce such an international warrant. Despite this legal assessment, Mamdani maintained his criticism of the Israeli leader, describing Netanyahu as a “war criminal” and stating that he is “not welcome” in New York City. He argued that the U.S. federal government, rather than the city, has the authority to address the issue and called on Washington to join the ICC and enforce the warrant. The statement marks a shift from Mamdani’s earlier comments, when he said his administration was consulting with the city’s legal department to determine whether the New York Police Department (NYPD) could detain Netanyahu during a potential visit to New York for the United Nations General Assembly later this year. After completing the legal review, the mayor said no such authority exists under current law The ICC issued arrest warrants in 2024 for Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity related to the Gaza conflict. Israel has rejected the allegations and does not recognize the legitimacy of the ICC proceedings, describing the court’s actions as politically motivated. The United States is also not a member of the ICC and does not recognize its jurisdiction over U.S. or Israeli officials. Mamdani’s remarks have triggered strong political reactions. Israeli officials condemned his comments, while supporters argued that his position reflects broader international concerns over accountability in the Gaza conflict. The debate has also highlighted the constitutional limits of municipal governments in matters involving foreign policy and international law, areas that fall primarily under the authority of the U.S. federal government. The episode underscores the legal distinction between political statements and executive authority. While New York City’s mayor can express views on international affairs, the enforcement of international arrest warrants and the conduct of foreign policy remain federal responsibilities under U.S. law.